TYPES OF SURGERY FOR BPH: TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF THE PROSTATE (TURP)
The most common type of prostate surgery, which is used by 90 percent of urologists, is a transurethral resection of the prostate, or TURP. In America, 400,000 men a year get a TURP. It is, next to cataract surgery, the most common operation performed on men who are sixty years of age or older.
The TURP is called a closed operation, as no incision is made. The TURP, regarded as the standard by many doctors, is often called "roto-rapturing" the gland. This type of reference doesn't present an encouraging mental picture for the patientwho wants to compare his operation to that of a snake-like pipe inserted in the toilet bowl to clear obstructions?
American men may feel encouraged to hear of experiments in England in which robots actually perform TURPs. I doubt that many men would stand in line waiting for their turn, but it has actually been performed. Further investigation is underway to see if robot-performed procedures could be the way to handle the backlog of males with BPH problems.
In the standard TURP, which takes about an hour, the doctor inserts a thin hose-like device, called a resectoscope, into the penis.
The patient does not feel any pain, as he is usually under either a local or a spinal-block anesthesia. If you have had arthroscopic work performed by an orthopedic surgeon, you will be familiar with this instrument. The resectoscope has a fiber-optic light source that guides an electrically heated needle to the prostate tissue that is causing the problems. The surgeon then scoops the tissue out, leaving only a shell of the prostate.
A representative sample of the tissue is given to a pathologist, who analyzes it to see if any cancer is present and, if so, what kind. If no cancer is presentgood newsthe blockage should no longer be a problem. (The bad news is that an absence of cancer at the time doesn't necessarily mean that cancer won't develop eventuallybut there are no guarantees in life.) After even a successful TURP, the urologist will probably advise the patient to continue with annual checkups and possibly have more frequent exams. But at least now he can get a good night's sleep and get his exercise in ways other than walking back and forth to the bathroom.
"There is remarkable improvement in symptoms, and the operation is safe," asserts Dr. Patrick C. Walsh. "Almost four out of five TURP patients respond favorably," agrees Dr. Joseph E. Oesterling.

Concerns Long-term complications may include poor bladder control, impotence, or, most commonly, retrograde ejaculation. In 1993, Dr. Steven A. Kaplan, Director of the Prostate Center at Columbia Presbyterian Hospital, said, "The bottom line is if you think you may want to father children in the future, an alternative therapy might be more appropriate." However, there is now a procedure whereby sperm can be separated from the urine after retrograde ejaculation and used for conception.
Dr. John Weinberg also points out problems associated with the TURP. Beginning in 1988, in separate studies of TURP patients, he discovered the following:
Twenty percent of patients who had moderate symptoms before surgery were unimproved after surgery.
Twenty percent of patients needed a second TURP operation within ten years of the first operation. The likelihood of tissue regrowth is especially high among the younger age group because they will most likely live many years after the operation. For senior citizens, it is doubtful that they will ever need a second operation.
Twenty-five percent of patients had short-term complications of varying severity following surgery.
Four percent ended up with persistent incontinence after surgery.
Five percent were impotent.
Up to 25 percent said they were dissatisfied with the results.
But perhaps Dr. Weinberg's most troubling finding related to premature death. He found that TURP patients were more likely to die from heart attacks within five years of surgery than patients who underwent open prostatectomies (see below), a riskier procedure than TURPs. Urologists are at a loss to explain this finding.
Dr. Weinberg's research raised doubts about surgery for some physicians. They recognized the great gaps in their knowledge and became less confident in the outcome of this procedure. It raised all kinds of red flags. The surgical recurrence rate was a shocking revelation. Spurred by these findings, the American Urological Association and federal health officials at the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research formed a panel to review the scientific literature and establish uniform surgical guidelines.
An analysis of deaths in various age groups was provided in a 1992 article in American Druggist: deaths occurred during or following surgery and were due to heart attack, stroke, pneumonia, blood clots, or other causes. In the first six weeks after surgery, out of 1,000 men, four men aged fifty-six to sixty-nine died; seven men aged seventy to seventy-four died; ten men aged seventy-five to seventy-nine died; twenty men aged eighty to eighty-four died; and thirty-four men over age eighty-five died.
Even when the TURP is successful, it involves a hospital stay of five to seven days and a convalescence of at least several weeks. It is expensive not only to the patient but also to the U.S. public health systemthe total cost of TURPs is soon expected to top five billion dollars annually.
A study of medical patients who had a TURP performed in the period from 1984 to 1990 found that the number of TURPs performed has been declining since 1987, conceivably due to increasing availability of alternative treatments or to changes in the treatment preferences of patients and their doctors.
*34\284\2*
Men's Health Erectile Dysfunction